Race

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Race

Post by Outis on Fri Oct 16 2015, 08:27

avatar
Outis
Admin

Posts : 773
Join date : 2014-12-15
Age : 51
Location : The Edge

View user profile http://knowthyself.forumotion.net/

Back to top Go down

Re: Race

Post by Outis on Fri Oct 16 2015, 08:30

avatar
Outis
Admin

Posts : 773
Join date : 2014-12-15
Age : 51
Location : The Edge

View user profile http://knowthyself.forumotion.net/

Back to top Go down

Re: Race

Post by Outis on Mon Jul 11 2016, 17:37

avatar
Outis
Admin

Posts : 773
Join date : 2014-12-15
Age : 51
Location : The Edge

View user profile http://knowthyself.forumotion.net/

Back to top Go down

Re: Race

Post by Outis on Mon Jul 18 2016, 17:03

Miscegenation does not erase race, it dilutes the genetically inherited potentials represented by the word 'race'.
If by 'race' we mean, and we understand, the sum of all environmental conditioning that promoted particular traits within a particular population existing and evolving within a particular environment, in isolation, for a particular length of time so as to propagate these traits only within their numbers, resulting in the sensually perceived divergence, then mixing, words, good intentions, nor anything else, can erase this.

avatar
Outis
Admin

Posts : 773
Join date : 2014-12-15
Age : 51
Location : The Edge

View user profile http://knowthyself.forumotion.net/

Back to top Go down

Re: Race

Post by Outis on Mon Jul 18 2016, 17:33

Contrary to the Modern zeitgeist, neither race nor gender, are social constructs.
The reverse is an attempt to socially cultivate (social selection/ eugenics).
In the case of gender, sexual specialization integrated into cultural conventions – gene harmonized with meme – the desired outcome is a sexually homogenized populace, now that reproduction is no longer a pressing matter of survival.
In the case of race, or breeds within a particular population, in this case the human species, the cultivation of social “blindness”, conflicts with the nature of sensual awareness.
The tactic of continuously hammering in a negative association with the appreciation of sensually perceived divergence, is combined with rhetoric about the “uniqueness” of the human species, as a being exempted from natural rules; the diminishment of divergence, based on size – what divergence existing deemed insignificant within a social system that inhibits going above the acceptable, or falling beneath it; the hypothetical “complexity” of man (feminine mystique pushed out to include the entire human race – now feminized making it mysterious and too confusing to understand), making all judgments inconclusive; an association of recognizing and acknowledging divergence with hatred and/or violence, or implying a mental defect in those that cannot help but see, attempting to shame, and use peer pressure to cause self-repression and silence; miscegenation promoted as a social idea(l) the slowly eliminates race, when it is denied, converting the population into a hodgepodge of increasing uniformity is all part of a social pressure cooker, reducing the ingredients into a nondescript pulp, a soup… the proverbial “melting pot” of Americanism .
avatar
Outis
Admin

Posts : 773
Join date : 2014-12-15
Age : 51
Location : The Edge

View user profile http://knowthyself.forumotion.net/

Back to top Go down

Portugal

Post by Outis on Sat Jul 23 2016, 08:52

Morse, Stephen H. wrote:They [the Portuguese] were to produce great captains and writers, and were able to become the wealthiest nation in Europe. But that same sixteenth century was to see the Portuguese power sink, and the independence, won by Alfonso Henriques and maintained by John the Great, vanish away; it was to see Portugal, which had been one of the greatest nations of its time, decline in fame, and become a mere province of Spain.  
Hand in hand with increased wealth came corruption and depopulation, and within a single century after the epoch-making voyage of Vasco da Gamma, the Portuguese people, tamed by the Inquisition, were to show no sign of their former hardihood.  
This is the lesson that the story of Portugal in the sixteenth century teaches: that the greatness of a nation depends not upon its wealth and commercial prosperity, but upon the thews and sinews and the stout hearts of its people.

A harrowing affirmation of race realism.
Brazil, an ex-Portuguese colony is a living example of how race-mixing diminishes genetic potentials  


Smith, Ray wrote:It may come as a surprise to hear of the Negroes’ role in the history of Portugal, for in spite of all the emphasis on “Black studies” in our schools, no one seems to talk about the Blacks’ contribution to Portugal—neither the Portuguese, the Blacks, nor our modern historians who are rewriting our history books to make the Negroes look good. It takes considerable digging in books written before our modern era of forced integration to uncover the story of Portugal.
Poets and explorers
By the middle of the 16th century, Portugal had risen to a position analogous to that of the United States today.
Portugal was the wealthiest, most powerful country in the world, with a large empire and colonies in Asia, Africa and America. The Portuguese people were, like the Elizabethans in England, poets and explorers, a race of highly civilized, imaginative, intelligent, and daring people. They showed great potential and had already made important contributions to the Renaissance. But, unlike England and other European countries, Portugal had a large and rapidly growing Negro population and, at the same time, its white population was declining. Portugal began the Negro slave trade after encountering Negroes in its explorations and forays into Africa. Portugal brought the first Black slaves to Lisbon in 1441, and they continued to be imported in such numbers that by 1550, the population of Portugal was 10 percent Negro (the U.S. is 13-14 percent Negro today).
Defilement of the blood
There was no taboo or injunction against sexual relations with the Negroes, and the Negroes blood soon became assimilated into the general population through miscegenation, so that today there are no Negroes, as such, in Portugal. The present-day population of Portugal is described by the New York Times Encyclopedic Almanac, 1971, as follows:  
‘Ethnic Composition: The people are a mixture of various ethnic strains, including Celtic, Arab, Berber, Phoenician, Carthaginian, Lusitanian, and other racial influences. The present population is one of the most homogeneous in Europe, with no national minorities.’ (Note that the Negro strain is not listed by the New York Times).
What you can see in Portugal today is the product of uniform, non-selective mixing of the 10 percent Negroes and 90 percent Whites into one homogeneous whole. In effect, it is a new race—a race that has stagnated in apathy and produced virtually nothing in the last 400 years.
The Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed., 1911, in its article on Portugal states, ‘The Portuguese intermarried freely with their slaves, and this infusion of alien blood profoundly modified the character and physique of the nation.  
It may be said without exaggeration that the Portuguese of the ‘age of discoveries’ and the Portuguese of the 17th and later centuries were two different races.’
The contribution of this new race to civilization in terms of literature, art, music, philosophy, science, etc. has been practically nothing.
Portugal today is the most backwards country in Europe.
avatar
Outis
Admin

Posts : 773
Join date : 2014-12-15
Age : 51
Location : The Edge

View user profile http://knowthyself.forumotion.net/

Back to top Go down

Re: Race

Post by Outis on Sat Jul 23 2016, 09:48

Stubbs, Vance wrote:’Nordicism’ among white nationalists is almost identical to the response to ‘racism’ in society at large.
Thus, White Nationalists treat Mediterraneans like Republicans treat Mestizos: they put emotional non-sequiturs up against biological facts, and they wind up trotting out ‘token Italians’ because accusations of an organization being ‘Nordic’ in white nationalism are taken like accusations of an organization being ‘all white’ in the mainstream. We’ve just fallen into the same mentality.
I’m not even really in agreement with Covington; I don’t consider the Greeks to be basically Turks, I place them on the white side of the line, but I can recognize they’ve undergone some degree of mongrelization and that this would constitute genetic damage in an Aryan nation.  
Not all genetic damage is caused by mongrelization, and my guess is that all humans have genetic flaws of some type.  Nonetheless some are much more damaged than others; in extreme cases this results in classification as a non-white or as a deformed/botched white, with exile in the former case and total sterilization or euthanization in the later case is the most sensible solution.  
In less severe cases the damage should be handled by a comprehensive eugenic system, which would use racial purity as a major (but not the only) determinant of genetic quality.
An adjustment is required, to bring up to speed racial theory.
In a world of absent accessible frontiers, where technologies and nihilism has already caused mongrelisation, a shifting of emphasis from genes to memes would eliminate any conflicts.
Racial genetics would be included in the outcome as inherited potential.
Nitpicking racial “purity” factors, will cause further fragmentation.
By making a small compromises based on performance (I’ve made it part of my positions on Timocratic revitalization).
Our certainty concerning the reality and importance of race would express itself pragmatically.
Permitting individuals of mixed-racial backgrounds to prove their quality would deal with the complexities of mongrelisation.
If Indo-Europeans genes are truly superior then they will rise to the top, if the Nihilistic leveling environment is returned to a harmony with natural selection processes.
Nature self-corrects, if given a chance; if human intervention is gradually reduced, or brought down to a balance with nature.  
avatar
Outis
Admin

Posts : 773
Join date : 2014-12-15
Age : 51
Location : The Edge

View user profile http://knowthyself.forumotion.net/

Back to top Go down

Re: Race

Post by Outis on Fri Aug 12 2016, 09:12

Idiocy is everywhere, on both sides of the political spectrum, but less relevant when it belongs to the 'left'.
It is true, even those agreeing with race realism are morons, who have no appreciation of the reasoning but only agree on purely emotional reasoning, as the entire liberal left finds disagreement in their community emotional reasoning.
All on the left, have no counter-argument other than social and emotional reasoning, and on the race realism side the majority are imbeciles, used by the left to dismiss all arguments they cannot argue against rationally.
This is the case across the board of issues dealing with the human condition.
avatar
Outis
Admin

Posts : 773
Join date : 2014-12-15
Age : 51
Location : The Edge

View user profile http://knowthyself.forumotion.net/

Back to top Go down

Re: Race

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum